
This Film Is Not Yet Rated Schauspielerinnen und Schauspieler
Dieser Film ist noch nicht bewertet ist ein amerikanischer Dokumentarfilm aus dem Jahr über das Bewertungssystem der Motion Picture Association of America und seine Auswirkungen auf die amerikanische Kultur. Regie führte Kirby Dick und. picr8.eu - Kaufen Sie This Film Is Not Yet Rated günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden Rezensionen und Details zu. This Film Is Not Yet Rated - Finden Sie alles rund um ihr Tier bei Amazon. Gratis Versand durch Amazon schon ab 29€. This Film Is Not Yet Rated ein Film von Kirby Dick mit Darren Aronofsky, Kirby Dick. Inhaltsangabe: Dokumentation über die mächtige Motion Picture Association. Besetzung und Stab von This Film Is Not Yet Rated, Regisseur: Kirby Dick. Besetzung: Darren Aronofsky, Kirby Dick, Atom Egoyan, Kimberly Peirce. Alles zum Film «This Film is not yet rated ()»: Reviews, Trailer, Bilder, Kinoprogramm und vieles mehr. Filmkritik: but will receive a NC nonetheless - OutNow hat «This Film is not yet rated ()» für dich angesehen.
Finden Sie perfekte Stock-Fotos zum Thema This Film Is Not Yet Rated sowie redaktionelle Newsbilder von Getty Images. Wählen Sie aus 77 erstklassigen. This film is not yet rated. English · DVD. US Version | Region code 1. Important note: This article is only playable on code-free devices or those. in the trailer for "Simpsons The Movie" (coming up in ), the very last sentence is "this film is not yet rated" (said by homer simpson himself. This film is not yet rated. Englisch · DVD. US Version | Ländercode 1. Wichtiger Hinweis: Dieser Artikel lässt sich nur auf codefree-Geräten abspielen oder auf. Dick mixes illustrative film clips, talking heads, historical notes on the evolution of ratings, a rundown on what appear to be the implicit criteria for ratings; a stalking investigation to discover the identities of raters and appeal board members; and his personal experience in submitting an earlier cut of this film to MPAA for a rating it got an NC for sexually explicit content.
Peirce raises the interesting notion that MPAA ratings may also be more biased against films with scenes connoting female sexual pleasure than films showing male pleasure.
Dick generally maintains a tone of wry humor, especially in showing us his day-by-day use of private investigators to track down and identify raters.
There's almost a Keystone Cops flavor to the stalking antics of the women PIs he has hired, with Dick along for the ride.
His re-creation of phone conversations with Joan Graves and the MPAA Chief Counsel, when he protests the rating of his own film, are also as funny as they are biased.
He uses animation to visually depict these officials as mean spirited grumps in split screen scenes that simultaneously show real time footage of Dick himself at his end of these conversations.
Dick is less successful in his review of information suggesting the implicit or inferable criteria raters use, based on film content and actual ratings.
He zips through too much information too fast for anybody to absorb. Still, this is a bravura piece of advocacy journalism. The film gives us ample information to conclude that the MPAA system of corporate control of ratings, when combined with control of film distribution and screening based on these ratings, effectively results in a clever censorship arrangement that would certainly violate First Amendment rights were it not for the illusion of "voluntariness" that is perhaps the most ingenious aspect of this system.
Anybody is free to make a film about anything, of course. But whether it will be screened, or even advertised, let alone able to return revenues sufficient to defray the costs of production, is a very carefully controlled process.
And what is the point of making a film that will not be seen? As in political campaigning, free speech is hardly free. Those with the most corporate clout rule both the campaigning and movie making businesses.
What's worse, in our characteristic American manner, we shrink puritanically from sex on screen but remain inured to the effects of violence.
My grade: 7. Looking for something to watch? Choose an adventure below and discover your next favorite movie or TV show. Visit our What to Watch page.
Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates.
Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites.
User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos.
Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This. Director: Kirby Dick. Added to Watchlist. From metacritic. November's Top Streaming Picks.
Watchlist Documentaries. Genre s : Documentary. Rating: TV-MA. Runtime: 97 min. See All Details and Credits. More You Might Like. The Bridge. Project Nim.
This Is Not a Film. Watch Now. Buy On. Critic Reviews. Eric Campos. It's vital that everyone who cares about film see this documentary.
Read full review. Scott Tobias. It thoroughly eviscerates the MPAA and makes a solid case that the culture has paid the price for its censorious practices.
His Dick's attacks are the equivalent of shooting ducks in a barrel, but these ducks had it coming. Dana Stevens. Feisty, intellectually engaging.
Ruthe Stein. Extremely amusing. Claudia Puig. There is no question that the organization is a riveting subject for a film. Anthony Lane.
As the movie shows, the whole furtive business of ratings is indeed ridiculous and should be overhauled.
Jonathan Rosenbaum. The main activity charted in the documentary is a kind of adolescent mischief, as Dick and a private investigator seek to uncover and expose the anonymous MPAA employees.
User Score. Write a Review. User Reviews. JackMontgomery Sep 18, This review contains spoilers , click expand to view. Before seeing this movie, I really was one of those consumers who would pick up a DVD and put it back down if it had an NC rating.
It wasn't because I was concerned about the content, but because of the misconceptions I had about the quality.
Then it turns out that 'pelvic thrusts' can potentially be the only reason for such a labeling What a joke.
What I gathered as being the overall message for this movie is that we are litterally being hearded like sheep by the fatcats of corporate america.
Gay hating, racist and priveleged people trying to alter what I find acceptable, because they find something else acceptable.
Great job! Sep 9, Mase Sep 16, A must see for any American filmgoer. Don't let that it is a documentary scare you off, highly entertaining and informative.
One of the most enjoyable and intruiguing movies of the year. Will surely start a good conversation afterwards as well. Riren Feb 25, This movie raises some great questions about our movie rating system and the needlessly shadowy MPAA organization.
However, it has some problems of its own. George Carlin discusses our societal problem with enjoying fictional violence and prohibiting fictional sex in his stand-up comedy This movie raises some great questions about our movie rating system and the needlessly shadowy MPAA organization.
George Carlin discusses our societal problem with enjoying fictional violence and prohibiting fictional sex in his stand-up comedy with greater depth and maturity than a dozen of these directors and producers do in actually discussing it for the film.
Almost the entire first half of the movie is devoted to a parade of writers, directors and producers complaining about getting a gratuitous rating for showing a sexual act or semi-erotic behavior - This Film Is Not Yet Rated gets redundant quickly for far too long on this matter.
They save the really compelling problems for use in small doses, such as Gunner Palace's R-rating; it was a documentary about what real soldiers are doing in Iraq, that got an R for drug use and profane language.
It is much easier to sympathize with a director who is just trying to show the American public how their soldiers work and relax than it is with a director who complains that she wasn't able to show a graphic threeway in her comedy, or that he was chastised for having a girl pick up a bottle with her labia.
Several of the things the documentary defends are juvenile, and it's kind of funny to see the film makers be so defensive about it.
Kirby Dick. Vielen Dank! Verleiher. Kritik Ma 2412. Er beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, inwieweit diskriminierende moralische Ansichten zu Missverhältnissen führen können. So heisst der Film richtig und darum findet man ihn auch nicht Ich Bin Der Ich Bin der Suchfunktion. Hast du Fragen, Tipps, Lob oder Kritik? Februar von Licker geschrieben. Bewertung verfassen Für Five Nights At FreddyS 1 an CeDe. So heisst der Film richtig und darum findet man ihn auch nicht mit der Suchfunktion. Budget. Produktionsjahr Wir freuen uns deshalb über jede Nachricht und beantworten alle E-Mails schnell, kompetent und gerne. Farb-Format Farbe. Seitenverhältnis 1.
0 Kommentare
Brarisar · 03.09.2020 um 03:02
Ich entschuldige mich, dass ich mit nichts helfen kann. Ich hoffe, Ihnen hier werden helfen. Verzweifeln Sie nicht.